{"id":219,"date":"2010-06-22T14:10:56","date_gmt":"2010-06-22T21:10:56","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/kai.mactane.org\/blog\/?p=219"},"modified":"2010-06-22T14:34:57","modified_gmt":"2010-06-22T21:34:57","slug":"apple-more-anticompetitive-than-microsoft","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/2010\/06\/22\/apple-more-anticompetitive-than-microsoft\/","title":{"rendered":"Apple: More Anticompetitive Than Microsoft"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Just under a month ago, an iPhone developer from Australia&nbsp;&mdash; one who&#8217;s <a href=\"http:\/\/shiftyjelly.wordpress.com\/2010\/04\/22\/sorry-media-but-apple-isnt-evil\/\">previously defended Apple&#8217;s approval process<\/a>&nbsp;&mdash; had his own app suddenly dis-approved by Apple. According to <a href=\"http:\/\/shiftyjelly.wordpress.com\/2010\/06\/01\/sentence-first-verdict-afterwards\/\">his blog post about the sudden revocation of approval<\/a>, &#8220;I had convinced my company to take a gamble and make some apps for Apple&#8217;s Store. <a href=\"http:\/\/www.groundhog.com.au\/tennis\/\">Tennis Stats<\/a> had been a great success and we wanted to get on the iPad train with My Frame. Things were going well, new features were being planned <em>money, real money <\/em>was being invested. Then Apple pulled the pin&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>I could say all sorts of things about schadenfreude, or how the developer&nbsp;&mdash; who goes by the <i>nom de plume<\/i> &#8220;Shifty Jelly&#8221;&nbsp;&mdash; should have seen this coming. But the guy&#8217;s already having a bad enough month, and there are broader issues to examine. Among them the thought raised by commenter Erik K. Veland:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Remember when Apple cracked down on Podcast downloaders? It was because they themselves were introducing this very feature in iTunes.<\/p>\n<p>[I] would surmise [that] Apple is now bringing &#8220;widgets&#8221; to their dashboard in the near future, and that they are pre-empting any apps conflicting with the &#8220;duplicate functionality&#8221; clause. [<a href=\"http:\/\/news.cnet.com\/8301-13846_3-10041187-62.html\">historical<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/almerica.blogspot.com\/2008\/09\/podcaster-rejeceted-because-it.html\">links<\/a>, added by Kai]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Once you&#8217;ve considered Apple&#8217;s penchant for banning apps that compete with features that are built in to the OS, you&#8217;ve got to consider how this compares against other companies&#8217; competitive practices. <!--more--> I think one of the most insightful points comes in a comment by user &#8220;Adrock&#8221;, nearly at the bottom of the page:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>the big difference between Xbox and iPhone\/iPad marketplace is the unpredictable changes. I don&#8217;t know of any XBox game that got recalled <em>after<\/em> its release because MS changed its mind about something.<\/p>\n<p>Honestly, it&#8217;s a despicable practice. Imagine Call of Duty getting yanked off the 360 a week after it&#8217;s released because it competed with Halo (an MS owned FPS). This is really no different. [spelling and punctuation corrected for clarity]<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Other commenters noted that while Microsoft had often put third-party utility makers out of business, by folding that functionality into Windows itself, it never actually <em>blocked the utilities from running on Windows<\/em>. It just made them unnecessary, then let them die off as users lost interest and no longer bothered to buy them. (One thing I definitely noticed about Shifty Jelly&#8217;s blog: he&#8217;s got some smart and insightful commenters.)<\/p>\n<p>So this raises the question: Why has Apple been getting such a free pass from geeks for so long? People who have been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.xkcd.com\/743\/\" title=\"xkcd: Infrastructures\">agitating for open document standards since 2003<\/a> (if not earlier) have happily accepted DRMed AACs on their iPods, and a single gatekeeper for apps on the iPhone\/iPad ecosystem&nbsp;&mdash; a single gatekeeper that even maintains the ability to <a href=\"http:\/\/www.roughlydrafted.com\/2008\/08\/06\/researcher-discovers-targeted-iphone-app-%E2%80%9Ckill-switch%E2%80%9D\/\">remotely auto-vanish apps after installation<\/a>. That part is eerily reminiscent of the &#8220;only authorized\/signed applications will run&#8221; feature of the TCPA\/Palladium proposal <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theregister.co.uk\/2002\/06\/25\/ms_to_eradicate_gpl_hence\/\">that got geeks so<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.cl.cam.ac.uk\/~rja14\/tcpa-faq.html\">very disturbed back<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pbs.org\/cringely\/pulpit\/2002\/pulpit_20020627_000433.html\">in the early 2000s<\/a>. We mobilized and managed to kill Palladium&nbsp;&mdash; and yet now we&#8217;re writing apps for the Apple Store, and some of us are even surprised when Apple decides to yank their certification?<\/p>\n<p>For once, the US government is <em>ahead of<\/em> the tech geeks on this curve, with the <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052748703509404575301242754089172.html\">Federal Trade Commission initiating a probe<\/a> of Apple&#8217;s anti-competitive practices&nbsp;&mdash; coincidentally, less than two weeks after Shifty Jelly&#8217;s post. (Of course, given the Department of Justice&#8217;s record with the Microsoft decision, I don&#8217;t expect anything of any real importance to come of this probe. Even if it leads to a full trial <em>and<\/em> a win against Apple, the &#8220;penalties&#8221;, if any, will amount to a slap on the wrist.)<\/p>\n<p>Microsoft never tried to use its dominance in the desktop OS market to keep us from accessing or storing porn on our computers. Microsoft never stopped small-scale, private developers from distributing software that would run on any and every Windows machine in existence. But Apple is on an anti-porn crusade that even denied the Gutenberg Project&#8217;s app simply because it could have been used to download a copy of the <cite>Kama Sutra<\/cite>, and exercises increasingly arbitrary-looking control over what apps can be distributed at all.<\/p>\n<p>So, will someone please tell me: Why is Apple still considered a &#8220;good guy&#8221;?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Just under a month ago, an iPhone developer from Australia&nbsp;&mdash; one who&#8217;s previously defended Apple&#8217;s approval process&nbsp;&mdash; had his own app suddenly dis-approved by Apple. According to his blog post about the sudden revocation of approval, &#8220;I had convinced my company to take a gamble and make some apps for Apple&#8217;s Store. Tennis Stats had [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[94,63,96,92,98,95,60,59,68,29,64,93],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=219"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":221,"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219\/revisions\/221"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kagan.mactane.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}